In Kentucky,
Police stop vehicles for many reasons, not just for suspicion of DUI.
But if you had been drinking or under the influence of a drug, then
you need to do several things to increase your chance of being found
innocent.
First, call a
criminal defense attorney if possible. Some officers will cooperate
with you and allow you to speak with an attorney if you inform the
officer that you need to understand your rights.
Listen to the
instructions from the officer and do not be rowdy, disruptive,
aggressive or physical towards the officer. Do not give the officer
grounds to arrest you because of your behavior. Be polite and
respectful (they will appreciate the respect and may return the
favor).
Do
as little as possible and do not volunteer information. You will have
to provide your name and present your drivers license, registration
and proof of insurance. But you can stop there. Note that anything
you say before the officer places you in custody can and probably
will be used against you. According to the court in Miranda v
Arizona, you have the
right to ask for an attorney and remain silent when in police
custody. Miranda applies ONLY if the officer asks you
questions when in police custody. Note that not all traffic stops
rise to the level of being in police custody: in these cases, the
police may ask you questions without having to invoke your Miranda
rights and then can use your statements as evidence against you. If
the officer follows procedure, they will probably write down
everything you say for the prosecutor to use. Therefore, be safe and
invoke your right to remain silent: you do not have to answer
questions such as how much you had to drink or if you had been
smoking marijuana. You do not need to confess to the officer that you
believe you are intoxicated or impaired.
Furthermore,
the officer may demand that you take several “field sobriety”
tests if the officer suspects you of driving under the influence. The
officer intends to collect evidence against you using the field
sobriety tests. The field sobriety tests commonly administered in
Kentucky include the walk and turn test, the one leg stand, the
horizontal gauze Nystagmus test, and a portable breath test.
However, in Kentucky, these tests are voluntary: you can refuse to
take these tests. A word of caution: be polite and respectful to the
officer should you decide to refuse these tests.
In
Kentucky an officer can arrest you based solely on his opinion as to
whether you drove the vehicle under the influence. Should the officer
decide to arrest you, they will transport you to a detention
facility. There exists a good chance that the officer will record
your voice during transit. Be aware of this fact and do not answer
any questions in the police cruiser. You need to remain calm and
quiet even if you believe the officer wrongly arrested you.
Once
at the detention facility, the officer will again request that you
submit to a test of your blood, breath or urine. All drivers
operating a vehicle in Kentucky impliedly consent to submit to these
tests. The officer should thereafter read you an implied consent
form, which essentially states that that you have 20 minutes or less
to contact an attorney for legal advice and that he will permit you
to obtain an independent blood test (at your expense) if and only if
you cooperate and submit to the requested blood, breath or urine
tests. Should you decide to refuse to take the test, Kentucky law
will presume guilt and increase the penalties levied against you
should you later decide to plead guilty or if a jury finds you
guilty. Remember, do not volunteer any information to anybody except
for your attorney. Some Kentucky jailers record all conversations
inside the detention centers and on the telephone. Any statements you
make against your interest may be used against you at a trial of the
matter.
Post by Lexington Criminal Defense Attorney Stephen J. Isaacs, Isaacs Law Office.
The United States Court in Miranda
v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966) held that statements made by a defendant during
interrogation and while in police custody are admissible at trial
only if the police had previously informed the defendant of his right
to counsel with an attorney before and during questioning and of the
right against self-incrimination before questioning by the police.
The prosecutor could thereafter use at trial any voluntary statements
made by the defendant. The Miranda court based its decision
on the Fifth Amendment right to counsel and the right to remain
silent.